There are two answers: not virus at all, 'twas all pfake. And yes, its a real virus, a real disease, not really a problem, don't listen to the deniers.
I am in the no virus side. But JJ work is very important. Keep the debate alive. Admit the problems of the offivial version. Offer improved theories. This keeps the conversation going, and that is good for everyone.
Doctors like easy answers that give them power: it is a virus, it is my business, it's not politics, so shut up and obey me.
People like me, not a doctor but with a keen interest in not getting killed, also like simple answers: you doctors are all idiots or sold out bastards to power, there was no virus, our rights were attacked to harm us, and we can restore our rights by demolishing the false science of virology.
Given that the medical freedom movement is infiltrated, and given that all doctors admit by now that this was more political than scientific, and given that they won't give up germ theory yet, I think both sides need an approximation and some rational mutual concessions, to keep fighting against the Perpetrators.
I think the strength of the MFM relays on the disunion and the dissent about everything. It's a paradox.
If Kennedy becomes a political leader and speaks clearly, their side of the movement will grow. Newcomers will be surprised that there is a vociferous opposition. They will attack, because that is what newcomers do. Then the no-virus side will grow too. And the MFM will grow even more.
If this thing catches more momentum, the System will attack. That is when we win.
Agree the Dr. Paul Alexander, PhD and Jonathan Couey video is excellent. Encapsulated so well what many of us have been trying to get across for over three years and counting.
I like what JJ Couey is doing.
There are two answers: not virus at all, 'twas all pfake. And yes, its a real virus, a real disease, not really a problem, don't listen to the deniers.
I am in the no virus side. But JJ work is very important. Keep the debate alive. Admit the problems of the offivial version. Offer improved theories. This keeps the conversation going, and that is good for everyone.
Doctors like easy answers that give them power: it is a virus, it is my business, it's not politics, so shut up and obey me.
People like me, not a doctor but with a keen interest in not getting killed, also like simple answers: you doctors are all idiots or sold out bastards to power, there was no virus, our rights were attacked to harm us, and we can restore our rights by demolishing the false science of virology.
Given that the medical freedom movement is infiltrated, and given that all doctors admit by now that this was more political than scientific, and given that they won't give up germ theory yet, I think both sides need an approximation and some rational mutual concessions, to keep fighting against the Perpetrators.
I think the strength of the MFM relays on the disunion and the dissent about everything. It's a paradox.
If Kennedy becomes a political leader and speaks clearly, their side of the movement will grow. Newcomers will be surprised that there is a vociferous opposition. They will attack, because that is what newcomers do. Then the no-virus side will grow too. And the MFM will grow even more.
If this thing catches more momentum, the System will attack. That is when we win.
Agree the Dr. Paul Alexander, PhD and Jonathan Couey video is excellent. Encapsulated so well what many of us have been trying to get across for over three years and counting.